Informed Accumulation · Case Study

DCTH

2013-05-02WATCH

FDA advisory panel voted 16-0 against the drug.

Price, rebased to 100 at the signalChart shows raw price · −53% forward low
100Signal fired−53%
Before the signal After the signal Signal fired
Signal
big_move_prob 0.77
Alert tier
WATCH
Spot at flag
$0.76
20-day outcome
20-day idiosyncratic −53%
Flow signature

🐜 pure aggregation. This describes the shape of the order flow — how the accumulation was assembled — not its intent and not its likely outcome. Micro-cap: at $0.76, quotes and EOD data are sparse — treat every reading as low-confidence.

What happened

Put accumulation ahead of an FDA ODAC panel that unanimously rejected the drug.

The catalyst: FDA advisory panel voted 16-0 against the drug.

The outcome: 20-day idiosyncratic −53% — a forward idiosyncratic move (beta-stripped vs SPY) over a mature 20-day window. The raw price shown on the chart reached −53%; the two differ because the outcome strips out the market’s beta.

Read this honestly

Informed, not privileged
The tape showed accumulation. It cannot prove who traded, what they knew, or why.
Direction was not predicted
IAS called that a large move was coming — magnitude, never which way. Two cases in this library resolved UP; that is the proof.
Ranked by magnitude
The edge is the magnitude estimate — P(large move) — not raw IAS. A high IAS with a low magnitude estimate is unusual but not notable for movement.
Long volatility, not long puts
These names often spike the other way first. The historical behavior looks like long volatility, not a directional put position.

This is a historical, out-of-sample detection shown for illustration. Informed Accumulation is a research and data signal, not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and it does not predict the direction of any single name. AInvest Options Pilot is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or financial planner. Options involve substantial risk of loss and are not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

DCTH 2013-05-02: Informed Accumulation Before FDA advisory panel voted 16-0 against the drug | Ainvest Options Pilot