🤝 MU $15.6M Conversion — A Delta-Hedged Financing Trade, Not a Bearish Bet

📅 July 2, 2026 | 🔥 Unusual Activity Detected

✅ Updated 2026-07-06: next-day OPRA OI confirms the conversion was OPENED — the $1,150 put leg's OI rose 994 → 1,492 (+498 ≈ trade size, BTO). The short $1,150 call leg's OI was flat (1,743 → 1,762, +19 = wash/transfer, inconclusive). Non-directional financing read unchanged. See RESOLVED box below.

---

🎯 The Quick Take

At 09:52 ET this morning, a desk landed a $15.6M gross options block on Micron Technology — simultaneously buying 500 Aug-21 $1,150 puts and selling 500 Aug-21 $1,150 calls at the exact same strike, paired with a 50,000-share stock block on the equity tape. Long stock plus a same-strike synthetic short equals a conversion: a perfectly delta-hedged financing structure used by institutional desks to harvest carry, borrow spreads, or put-call parity mispricings — not a directional bet against Micron. Before you read "bought $10M in puts" and react, know this: the same desk simultaneously holds 50,000 shares long, canceling every bit of that bearish delta. This is a quant desk doing math, not a whale screaming Micron is crashing.

---

📊 Company Overview

Micron Technology (NASDAQ: MU) is the only U.S.-based manufacturer of DRAM, NAND, and High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM) — the critical AI-chip ingredient that sits directly on top of Nvidia and AMD's accelerators. It is the world's third-largest DRAM producer (behind Samsung and SK Hynix) and has become one of the primary beneficiaries of the AI infrastructure build-out.

• Market Cap: ≈$1.19 trillion (≈13th most valuable company globally as of July 2026)
• Sector / Industry: Information Technology — Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
• Current Price: ≈$1,055 (July 2, 2026); July 1 close $1,032.28; all-time-high close $1,213.56 on June 25, 2026
• YTD Performance: ≈+284% year-to-date; ≈+800% off the AI-cycle lows

---

💰 The Option Flow Breakdown

📊 What Just Happened (09:52:24 ET, July 2, 2026)

🤝 BLOCK CROSS — Two option legs, same $1,150 strike, same instant, negotiated off-book:

Gross premium exchanged (options only): ≈$15.6M ($10M put + $5.6M call notional). Net option debit: ≈$4.4M (cost of the long put minus the short call credit received).

The equity leg — essential to reading the full picture:

Simultaneously on the equity tape, a 50,000-share MU block printed at ≈$1,047 via a negotiated Cash-Only / Contingent stock transaction — roughly $52.35M in stock. This is the third leg of the conversion and makes the entire structure delta-neutral.

The three legs together:

Net portfolio delta: ≈0. Fully delta-neutral.

---

✅ RESOLVED — Put Leg Opened; Call Leg Flat. Non-Directional Read Unchanged

The July 6 pre-market OPRA snapshot (reflecting July 2 end-of-day) is in. (July 3 was a full market holiday for the Independence Day observance, so the next snapshot was July 6, not July 7.)

• Put leg — opened. OI rose +498, almost exactly the 500-contract print → the long put was bought to open (BTO). The synthetic-short side of the conversion was freshly established.
• Call leg — flat. OI barely moved (+19), neither the +500 of a fresh short nor the −500 of a close. At the strike level the short call was a wash / transfer — we cannot confirm it as a new short, but it was not a clear close either.

The conclusion does not change: this is a delta-neutral conversion (long stock + long put + short call) — a financing / basis trade, NOT a bearish bet on Micron. The put opening confirms the desk built (rather than unwound) the structure; the flat call leg is immaterial to the non-directional read.

---

🤓 What This Actually Means — Plain English

Let's be direct because this trade will be wildly misread by retail traders seeing "institution buys $10M in MU puts" in a headline. That framing is wrong in a way that could cost you money if you act on it.

A conversion is a three-part structure: long stock + long put + short call at the same strike.

Think of it like owning a house:

• The long put ($1,150 floor) is like buying insurance that guarantees you can sell the house for $1,150 even if the market crashes
• The short call ($1,150 ceiling) is like agreeing to sell the house for $1,150 if your neighbor exercises a right to buy it
• The long stock is the house itself

Result: You don't care if the house goes to $800 or $1,400. Your effective exit is locked at $1,150. You have no directional exposure to the stock.

Why would a desk do this?

Conversions are mechanical financing structures, not market views:

• 🔑 Stock borrow income: The desk can lend those 50,000 shares into the equity lending market, earning a borrow rate. For a high-momentum name like MU, stock loan rates are elevated. The synthetic short via the options legs locks in the lending income with zero price risk.
• 💵 Put-call parity arbitrage: If options are mispriced relative to each other and to the risk-free rate, a quant desk captures the spread mechanically. The put at $208.11 vs. the call at $111.00 vs. spot $1,055.12 implies a specific "fair value" for the conversion; if the market is slightly off, the desk earns the difference risk-free.
• 📅 Carry capture: Any dividends or special distributions during the hold period (through Aug-21) accrue to the long stock holder. The synthetic short hedges the price risk, leaving the dividend as pure income.

The economics: The desk bought stock at ≈$1,047 and paid a net $97.11 in option premium (put $208.11 minus call $111.00). Effective cost basis: ≈$1,144.11. Guaranteed exit via conversion: $1,150. Locked-in stock-leg profit alone: ≈$5.89/share × 50,000 shares = ≈$295,000 — before any stock lending or dividend income. That's a risk-free arbitrage if the parity math works out.

What this is NOT: This is not a desk saying "Micron is going to crash, protect yourself." The $10M put purchase is a hedge within a structure — every dollar of bearish put delta is canceled by the bullish stock delta. The institution is entirely indifferent to where MU trades between now and August 21.

Grading our claims:

• PROVEN: Two $1,150-strike legs (put BUY + call SELL at 09:52:24) + 50,000-share equity block at the same timestamp = conversion geometry. The three-leg structure locks in delta-neutral positioning.
• INFERRED: Financing/arbitrage motive (borrow rate capture, parity arb, or dividend carry) — strong inference given conversion geometry, but we cannot observe the desk's books.
• UNKNOWABLE: The specific financing rationale, the desk's identity, or whether additional legs (futures, swaps, credit instruments) are attached off the options market.

---

📈 Technical Setup / Chart Check-Up

YTD Performance

Micron has been one of the most explosive large-cap stories of 2026. From its AI-cycle lows to the June 25 all-time-high close of $1,213.56, MU has run ≈+800% off the bottom and ≈+284% year-to-date. The move was punctuated by the June 24 blowout FQ3 earnings print — $41.46B revenue (+346% YoY), record 84.9% gross margin — which sent shares ≈+14.6% in after-hours to ≈$1,199.

Since that ATH close, MU has pulled back ≈13% to the $1,032–$1,055 range as the peak-cycle / memory-glut debate re-emerges. Whether this is healthy consolidation before the next leg or early-cycle peaking is the core bull-bear debate — with analyst price targets ranging from $840 to $2,000.

Key chart observations:

• 🚀 ATH close at $1,213.56 (June 25) — ≈15% above today's $1,055; first resistance retest target
• 📉 Current range $1,032–$1,055 — digesting the post-earnings gap spike
• ⚠️ Pullback watch: Memory-glut headlines or AI-capex air-pocket fears could accelerate the move toward $1,000 support

---

Gamma-Based Support & Resistance Analysis

The gamma exposure map reveals the key price levels where market-maker hedging flows will dominate near-term price action:

🔵 Support Levels (Put Gamma Concentration = Dealers Buy Dips Here):

• $1,000 — Very Strong (total GEX ≈10.13): A major round-number floor, now ≈5.2% below the $1,055 spot. If MU slices through here on volume, expect selling pressure to accelerate. This is the near-term bull/bear line in the sand.
• $950 — Dominant Put Wall (total GEX ≈40.30; put gamma ≈38.72, overwhelmingly dominant): This is the single largest gamma concentration in the entire MU chain — roughly 4x the next-strongest level. Dealers holding massive put exposure at $950 are structurally forced to buy aggressively if MU dips here, making it a powerful mechanical floor ≈10% below current price.
• $900 — Very Strong secondary floor (total GEX ≈10.52): The disaster scenario would need to reach here — ≈15% below today's price.

🟠 Resistance Levels (Call Gamma Concentration = Dealers Sell Rallies Here):

• $1,100 — Moderate (total GEX ≈3.88): The first meaningful resistance cluster above current price, ≈4.3% overhead. Call dealer hedging creates natural selling pressure approaching this level.
• $1,150 — Today's conversion strike (total GEX ≈1.53): Open interest added by today's conversion trade will reinforce this as a zone of concentrated dealer hedging.
• $1,200 — Moderate to Strong (total GEX ≈2.92): Near the all-time high. This is where call-gamma dealers will systematically hedge any ATH retest, creating a ceiling effect.

What this tells traders: MU is sandwiched between a dominant put wall at $950 (powerful floor) and a call wall building at $1,100–$1,200 (natural ceiling). The $1,000 level is the critical near-term pivot — break below and momentum likely sweeps toward $950 where dealer buying kicks in hard. To the upside, clearing $1,100 and $1,200 in sequence is what an ATH retest requires.

Note on the conversion strike: The desk struck at $1,150 — exactly between the $1,100 call wall and the $1,200 ATH zone. This is consistent with a financing desk targeting a strike that has meaningful open interest and put-call parity activity, not with a directional view.

---

Implied Move Analysis

MU's implied volatility reflects the aftermath of its historic June 24 FQ3 blowout. IV typically spikes into earnings and contracts afterward. With the next scheduled catalyst — FQ4 2026 earnings expected in late September — being ≈80+ days away, the Aug-21 expiration (≈50 days) lands in a "between-earnings" window where binary event risk is lower but underlying vol remains elevated from the earnings gap.

Key implied-move context for the Aug-21 conversion structure:

• 📅 Aug-21 does not capture FQ4 earnings (late September) — the structure expires pre-earnings, reducing binary event risk within the window
• 🎢 Post-ATH pullback IV: After a ≈14.6% after-hours gap and $1,213.56 ATH, MU's implied vol remains well above its pre-earnings baseline; the $208.11 put price (≈19.7% of spot) reflects substantially elevated premium — a rich environment for financing desks to harvest via the conversion
• 💡 The desk captured this elevated IV: By shorting the $1,150 call at $111 against long stock, the conversion monetizes the elevated vol regime post-earnings — textbook for a financing desk targeting a specific parity spread

---

🎪 Catalysts

✅ Recent Catalysts (Already Happened)

Fiscal Q3 2026 Earnings Blowout — June 24, 2026 🏆

Micron's FQ3 2026 print was the single largest quarterly beat in company history:

• 📊 Revenue: $41.46B, +346% YoY — from $9.30B a year ago — beating consensus of ≈$35.82B by ≈$5.6B
• 💰 EPS: Non-GAAP $25.11; GAAP $24.67 — topped estimates by ≈$4.62
• 📈 Gross Margin: 84.9% non-GAAP — a company record driven by HBM pricing and favorable mix
• 💵 Operating Cash Flow: $25.39B in a single quarter (from $4.61B a year ago)
• 🚀 Stock reaction: Shares jumped 14.6% after-hours, touching ≈$1,199; ATH close $1,213.56 on June 25

HBM Sold Out Through 2026 + ≈$100B in Binding Contracts 🤝

Per the FQ3 investor call, Micron's HBM is effectively sold out through all of calendar 2026, backed by roughly $100 billion in binding multi-year Strategic Customer Agreements. This converts a historically cyclical business into a partially contracted, high-visibility revenue stream.

HBM4 in High-Volume Shipment 🔬

Micron's HBM4 — a 12-high 36GB stack at ≈2.8 TB/s is in high-volume shipment for Nvidia's Vera Rubin platform, with qualification samples out to multiple hyperscaler customers. HBM4E development is underway for 2027 production.

23 Analysts Raised Price Targets Post-FQ3 📣

Per TheStreet, 23 analysts raised targets following the beat — DA Davidson $2,000, Cantor Fitzgerald $2,000, Susquehanna $2,000, Deutsche Bank $1,550, Morgan Stanley $1,200 (Overweight). Consensus lands at ≈$1,410, with a range of $840 to $2,000 — an unusually wide spread reflecting the scale of the bull/bear cycle debate.

---

🔮 Upcoming Catalysts (Next 6 Months)

Fiscal Q4 2026 Earnings — Late September 2026 (est. Sept 22–29) 📅

This is the next binary event. The company has guided:

• 🎯 Revenue: $50.0B ± $1.0B — another record quarter
• 💰 Non-GAAP EPS: $31.00 ± $1.00
• 📊 Gross Margin: ≈86% — expansion from the record 84.9% in FQ3

The Aug-21 conversion expires ≈5–6 weeks before this event. The structure closes out in a pre-earnings window, which is one reason the desk likely targeted this specific expiration.

FY2027 Capex Step-Up 🏭

Quarterly capex is expected to run above the FQ4 level of ≈$10B to fund HBM and DRAM capacity expansion. Watch FQ4 call commentary for the capex framing — aggressive signals confidence; cautious signals cycle concern.

DRAM/NAND Pricing Supercycle 💵

Because HBM consumes ≈3x the wafer capacity of standard DRAM per bit, the HBM ramp is tightening conventional memory supply. Contract DRAM rose ≈15–20% QoQ in FQ3, with consumer DRAM projected up another ≈10–15% through 2H 2026. Supply tightness is expected to persist into 2027.

HBM TAM Inflection Toward ≈$100B 📈

The HBM market is projected to grow toward ≈$100 billion by 2027–2028 at a ≈40% CAGR. As the only U.S.-based HBM supplier, Micron is positioned to hold or expand its share if AI-accelerator demand persists.

---

⚠️ Risk Catalysts (Negative)

Peak-Cycle / Memory Glut De-Rating 🐻

After an ≈800% run and record 84.9% margins, the market is already debating the top. A ≈4% pullback occurred on early-July glut fears despite record results. Bears argue margins near 86% are the ceiling, not the floor, and that Samsung and SK Hynix expanding capacity simultaneously could flip the HBM shortage narrative.

Cyclicality: Memory remains inherently boom-bust. The $100B in binding SCAs mitigate but do not eliminate the risk of commodity DRAM/NAND price reversals beyond the locked HBM portion.

AI Demand Concentration: The bull thesis depends heavily on a small number of hyperscalers buying HBM at scale. Any AI-capex air-pocket would hit HBM demand disproportionately.

Capex Treadmill: FY2027 quarterly capex likely above ≈$10B. If pricing softens before the capacity is absorbed, free cash flow shrinks fast.

---

🎲 Price Targets & Probabilities

Using GEX levels, the catalyst timeline, and the stock's technical position:

📈 Bull Case (30% probability) — $1,150–$1,250+

How we get there:

• ✅ FQ4 earnings (late September) deliver near the $50B guide, with gross margins expanding to ≈86%
• 🚀 HBM4 customer wins expand beyond Nvidia (AMD, hyperscaler direct orders follow)
• 📊 DRAM/NAND price hikes sustain through 2H 2026 as HBM wafer diversion keeps conventional memory tight
• 🔬 Breakout above $1,100 call wall triggers dealer short-covering; momentum retest of ATH $1,213.56 and $1,250

Probability note: Requires clean execution through a ≈$1.19T market cap with the $840-to-$2,000 analyst PT spread reflecting genuine uncertainty.

🎯 Base Case (45% probability) — $950–$1,100 (Consolidation)

Most likely:

• 📊 Digestion of the ≈800% run; stock churns between $950 (put wall, dominant floor) and $1,100 (call wall resistance)
• 💤 No major negative catalyst before FQ4 earnings; the market waits for late-September data
• 🎢 Memory-glut headlines occasionally push toward $1,000 support, but the FQ4 $50B guidance floor prevents structural breakdown

📉 Bear Case (25% probability) — $800–$950

What breaks the thesis:

• 😰 Memory glut materializes faster than expected; contract DRAM prices reverse; Samsung/SK Hynix flood capacity
• 🤖 A key hyperscaler cuts or defers HBM orders, cracking the "sold out through 2026" narrative
• 📊 FQ4 misses the $50B guide or management guides FY2027 cautiously; investors de-rate 86% margins as unsustainable
• 📉 Break below $1,000 → momentum sweeps to $950 (dominant put wall); sustained break below $950 → $900

---

💡 Trading Ideas — 4 Investor Profiles

1. 🎰 YOLO Trader — "I Want to Bet on MU Moving BIG"

Real talk first: The conversion itself earns near-zero from directional moves — it is designed to be flat. Do not copy it. What you actually want is a directional trade on MU.

If you are bullish on MU (separate from this trade):

• Play: Buy MU $1,100 or $1,150 call options, Sept-19 expiry (captures FQ4 earnings)
• Why: If MU retakes the $1,100 call wall and retests the ATH, OTM calls move dramatically in your favor
• What you need: A ≈4–9% rally from $1,055 just to reach these strikes; the stock must keep moving for time value to work
• Max loss: 100% of premium paid
• Only do this if you have a specific entry thesis (e.g., MU bouncing off $1,000 support) and can stomach a full loss

Risk level: EXTREME 🎰

---

2. 📈 Swing Trader — "Give Me a 1-4 Week Setup With a Clear Level"

The read: MU is consolidating between $1,000 (major GEX pivot) and $1,100 (call wall resistance). Today's conversion is institution-neutral — not a signal in either direction. The setup belongs to technicals and catalysts, not to this block.

Setups to watch:

• 👀 Bullish trigger: MU reclaims and holds above $1,060–$1,080 on volume → target $1,100–$1,120. Stop below $990.
• 👀 Bearish trigger: Break and close below $1,000 on volume → sweep toward $950 (dominant put wall). Stop above $1,020.
• 📅 No binary earnings event until late September — the Aug-21 window is between-earnings, reducing overnight gap risk for multi-week swing trades
• ⚠️ Avoid getting long in no-man's-land between $1,000 and $1,060 without a clear momentum confirmation

Risk level: Moderate ⚖️

---

3. 💵 Premium Collector — "Show Me the Income Play"

This trade is your playbook, just retail-sized. The desk selling the Aug-21 $1,150 call at $111 against long stock is textbook covered-call income — collecting ≈$111 per share over 50 days against a $1,055 spot. That's ≈10.5% potential return over 50 days on the options leg alone (at a strike ≈9% OTM).

For retail-size equivalent:

• Play: Own MU shares + sell covered $1,100 or $1,150 calls (Aug-21 or Sept-19 expiry)
• Income rationale: Post-ATH-pullback implied vol remains elevated; you are selling elevated vol after the burst
• At $1,100 Aug-21: Premium likely ≈$45–$70 depending on current IV; caps your upside at $1,100 but generates immediate income
• Risk: If MU runs past your strike, shares get called away and you miss upside above the strike. This is the tradeoff — known income now vs. potential upside later.

Alternate structure — cash-secured put:

• Play: Sell $1,000 put (Aug-21) cash-secured — get paid to wait for a dip entry you'd want anyway
• Why $1,000: The dominant GEX support wall; if assigned, you buy stock at the put wall floor with the premium reducing your cost basis

Risk level: Conservative (requires stock ownership or cash collateral) 🛡️

---

4. 📚 Entry-Level Investor — "What Does This All Even Mean for Me?"

Let's strip it down to what you actually need to know.

What happened: A big institution simultaneously bought a massive "insurance policy" on Micron (the put), agreed to sell Micron at $1,150 (the short call), AND bought 50,000 shares of the actual stock — all in the same second. These three pieces cancel each other out completely. The institution makes or loses essentially nothing based on where MU trades.

What it does NOT mean: This is NOT a signal that "smart money is betting Micron will crash." Do not read "bought $10M in puts" and sell your MU shares.

What it DOES mean: A financing desk is collecting a spread using Micron as the instrument. It is arithmetic, not conviction.

The real Micron story for retail investors is the fundamentals: record $41.46B in Q3 revenue, record 84.9% margins, HBM sold out through 2026, $100B in contracts, and $50B FQ4 guidance. That is the signal. This block trade is noise.

If you want simple MU exposure:

• Consider a small stock position with a pre-planned stop near the $1,000 GEX floor
• Defined-risk call spreads (e.g., buy $1,050 call / sell $1,150 call, Sept-19) limit your loss to the net premium paid and require less capital than stock
• Never risk more than you can afford to lose entirely — MU is high-volatility and can move 10%+ in a single session

Risk level: Research mode — study the fundamentals first 📊

---

⚠️ Risk Factors

Don't get caught by these:

• 🔄 Peak-cycle memory glut: After ≈800% off cycle lows, the market is watching for any DRAM/NAND price reversal. A major hyperscaler cutting HBM orders or Samsung/SK Hynix aggressively adding supply could de-rate MU 30–50% from current levels regardless of the FQ3 blowout numbers.
• 💰 Valuation premium at ≈$1.19T: At record market cap after a record quarter, expectations are already embedded. Any slip in the $50B FQ4 guidance — revenue, margins, or initial FY2027 framing — could trigger a violent re-rating downward.
• 🤖 AI capex concentration risk: The entire HBM thesis depends on a small cluster of hyperscalers buying HBM at scale for AI accelerators. A single AI-capex pause or reallocation would hit MU's HBM revenue disproportionately.
• 📊 Capex treadmill: FY2027 quarterly capex likely above ≈$10B. If pricing softens before new capacity is absorbed, free cash flow shrinks materially.
• 🌍 Samsung and SK Hynix capacity expansion: All three memory makers are adding HBM capacity simultaneously. The same forces driving today's shortage can flip to oversupply if AI-accelerator demand softens or slows faster than the supply build.
• ⚠️ Tape limitations — what OPRA cannot tell us: The three legs shown (two options + the equity block) prove the conversion geometry. OPRA cannot tell us: the desk's identity, the specific financing rationale (borrow vs. parity vs. dividend), whether additional off-exchange legs are part of the structure, or any directional intent. The delta-neutral conclusion is inferred from the structure — strongly, but not proven with certainty.

---

🎯 The Bottom Line

Here's the deal: Retail traders scrolling past "institution buys $10M in MU puts" will assume it's a warning shot. It is not. A desk simultaneously holding 50,000 long shares perfectly cancels the synthetic short delta created by the put and call legs. The conversion earns a financing spread — a small guaranteed return from put-call parity or stock borrow — and has zero directional opinion on Micron stock.

The real Micron story is the fundamentals: the single largest quarterly earnings beat in company history on June 24, $41.46B in revenue, 84.9% margins, $25.11 EPS, $100B in binding HBM contracts, HBM4 in high-volume shipment, and a $50B FQ4 guide. The conversion block is a quant desk monetizing elevated implied vol and a financing spread — not a directional view on any of that.

The real risk to watch is the peak-cycle debate, not this trade. After ≈800%, the late-September FQ4 print needs to deliver near $50B to justify current levels. That is the binary event.

Mark your calendar:

• 📅 July 7, 2026 (Monday, pre-market ≈06:30 ET): First full OI snapshot post-trade. PUT OI: if opening, expect ≈1,494 (up ≈500). CALL OI: if opening, expect ≈2,200 (up ≈500). If OI falls on either leg, that leg was closing a prior position.
• 📅 July 3, 2026: Early-close session (Independence Day weekend — markets on limited hours)
• 📅 August 21, 2026: Conversion expiration; both option legs settle, structure unwinds
• 📅 Late September 2026 (est. Sept 22–29): FQ4 2026 earnings — $50B revenue guidance, ≈86% gross margin, $31.00 EPS; the next real binary catalyst for MU

Final verdict: Micron's AI-memory scarcity story — sold-out HBM, $100B contracts, best margins in company history — remains intact and extraordinary. This specific $15.6M block is neutral noise from a financing desk. Watch the $1,000 GEX floor for near-term support and the $1,100 call wall for resistance. The next real test is late-September FQ4 earnings.

---

Disclaimer: Options trading involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. This analysis is for educational purposes only and is not financial advice. The conversion structure described here is an institutional financing mechanism involving simultaneous equity and options positions — typically requiring access to stock lending infrastructure, derivatives clearing, and arbitrage capital not available to most retail traders. Do not attempt to replicate a conversion without fully understanding margin requirements, stock borrow mechanics, assignment risk, and the full three-leg execution requirements. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own due diligence and consider consulting a licensed financial advisor before trading options or equities.

---

About Micron Technology: Micron Technology designs and manufactures DRAM, NAND, and High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM), making it the only U.S.-based producer of all three major memory types. With a market cap of ≈$1.19 trillion, it is the primary domestic beneficiary of the AI accelerator memory buildout and a critical supplier to Nvidia's Vera Rubin and next-generation AI platforms, with HBM sold out through calendar 2026 and ≈$100 billion in binding multi-year Strategic Customer Agreements.

Last updated: 2026-07-06 — open/close RESOLVED via next-day OPRA OI. $1,150P (BUY) 994 → 1,492 (+498 ≈ size) = OPEN (BTO); $1,150C (SELL) 1,743 → 1,762 (+19) = FLAT / inconclusive (wash-transfer). Delta-neutral conversion (financing), non-directional read unchanged. (July 3 was a full market holiday; resolving snapshot was July 6, not July 7.)