🛡️ MU $24M Call Overwrite + $11M Put Hedge — A Winner Buckling Up for the Fall

📅 July 13, 2026 | 🔥 Unusual Activity Detected

✅ Updated July 14, 2026 — OI RESOLVED. The next-day OPRA snapshot confirms BOTH legs OPENED — the collar is real. Call $1,210: 184 → 1,346 (+1,162). Put $920: 449 → 1,354 (+905). Neither leg fell, so the closing/unwind failure mode did not occur. See the ✅ RESOLVED box below.

---

🎯 The Quick Take

A holder just put a defensive collar on Micron at 11:15 and 12:41 ET today: sold 1,000 Jun-2027 $1,210 calls for ≈$24.0M (capping upside way above spot) and bought 861 Sep-18-2026 $920 puts for ≈$11.0M (near-money downside insurance) — a net ≈$13.0M CREDIT collected while wrapping protection around a position that's up ≈200%+ YTD but has already pulled back ≈22% from its June record high. This isn't a bearish bet on Micron's story — HBM4 is sold out for 2026 and guidance points to a ≈$50B September quarter — it's someone locking in a monster win before Q4 earnings on September 29. Translation: the smart money isn't selling MU, they're insuring it. 🛡️

---

📊 Company Overview

Micron Technology (MU) is one of the largest memory-chip makers on Earth, and 2026's HBM boom has turned it into one of the market's best-performing mega-caps:

• Market Cap: ≈$1.1 Trillion
• Industry: Semiconductors & Related Devices
• Current Price: ≈$926 (down ≈22% from its June 25 record high, down ≈7% from ≈$998 just a few sessions ago)
• Primary Business: DRAM and NAND flash memory/storage, with a fast-growing high-bandwidth memory (HBM) franchise feeding the AI data-center buildout. Vertically integrated, headquartered in Boise, Idaho, ≈53,000 employees.

Micron's fiscal Q3 2026 (reported June 24) was a record quarter — revenue ≈$41.5B (+346% YoY), gross margin ≈84.6% — and management guided the September quarter to ≈$50B revenue, ≈86% margin, ≈$31 EPS. 2026 HBM4 output is fully sold out under long-term agreements. And yet the stock has shed ≈$350B of market value since late June as the whole memory complex fell into a bear market. That tension — record fundamentals vs. a sharp pullback — is exactly the backdrop for today's trade.

---

💰 The Option Flow Breakdown

📊 What Just Happened (The Tape, July 13, 2026)

Flow-type tags: 🤝 BLOCK CROSS on the call (a broker matched a known buyer and seller off the lit book — 11% across NBBO, near the bid) · ⚡ LIT (mid-fill) on the put (regular displayed-book execution, but printed 52% across NBBO — dead center of the bid/ask, so the aggressor side is genuinely ambiguous despite the screenshot marking it "ASK").

🚦 Mechanism & Open/Close — What The Tape Actually Proves

• Call leg ($1,210 SELL): dominant condition on the tape is a single-leg cross (a negotiated, off-book block with a known counterparty) — this is deliberate institutional position management, not an aggressive lit sweep. Prior OI was 184; today's size is 1,000 → this is a fresh OPEN by size, clean and unambiguous. Note: the tape shows total volume at this strike of ≈1,260 contracts vs. the screenshot's 1,000 — we're using the reconciled $24.0M/1,000-contract print as the primary trade; the extra ≈260 contracts may be additional related fills at the same cross.
• Put leg ($920 BUY): dominant condition is ordinary lit execution — but at 52% across NBBO (essentially the midpoint), we can't confidently call this an aggressive "lifted the offer" buy. The tape also shows several nearby multi-leg prints in the same window, meaning this 861-lot buy may be one leg of a larger structure we can't fully reconstruct from the option tape alone. Prior OI was 449; today's size is 861 → also a fresh OPEN by size.

✅ RESOLVED — Next-Day OI Confirms: BOTH Legs OPENED — the Collar Is Real. Read HELD.

Resolved 2026-07-14 from the ≈06:30 ET OPRA open-interest snapshot. This box replaces the ⏳ provisional flag published on July 13.

Both projections landed, and the call leg actually overshot. We said call-side OI at $1,210 should rise from 184 toward ≈1,184 — it printed 1,346 (+1,162, more than the 1,000-lot trade size, meaning additional opening flow joined the same strike that session). We said put-side OI at $920 should rise from 449 toward ≈1,310 — it printed 1,354 (+905 against an 861-lot trade). No transfer drag on either leg; both are genuine, brand-new open interest.

Verdict: the "opening collar" read HELD on both legs, and the failure mode we warned about did not happen. We wrote: "If either OI print instead falls or stays flat, that flips today's opening-collar read to a closing/unwind." Neither fell. Both rose. The order types are now proven rather than inferred: STO on the $1,210 call (a fresh overwrite), BTO on the $920 put (fresh downside protection). Someone really did put on this structure on July 13, and they are still holding it.

What open interest still cannot tell you: the call leg printed as a cross, so we know a position was opened but we cannot read the counterparty's conviction or see the underlying MU stock position we believe sits behind the overwrite. "Someone is now short $1,210 calls and long $920 puts" is proven. "Someone is protecting a large existing MU long" remains inferred — sensible, consistent with the structure, but not provable from the option tape alone.

🤓 What This Actually Means — Plain English

Here's the trade, decoded:

• 💰 Leg 1 — Sold $1,210 calls, collected $24.0M: This is a covered call / overwrite, not a new short bet. Someone who already owns a big MU position (stock, deep calls, or both) sold calls ≈29% above spot expiring nearly a year from now. They're saying: "I'll happily cap my gains above $1,210 in exchange for $24 million in cash today." Because it's a cross, we genuinely can't read conviction from the print itself — only that a known counterparty was willing to take the other side.
• 🛡️ Leg 2 — Bought $920 puts, paid $11.0M: This is straightforward downside insurance, struck almost exactly at the money (spot was $925.84 at the print). If MU drops meaningfully before September 18, these puts pay off. The mid-fill means we can't say this was urgent, panic-buying — it looks more like methodical hedging than a fire-sale.
• 🧮 Net effect — a $13.0M CREDIT collar: Selling the calls more than paid for the puts, so this holder didn't just protect their downside — they got paid $13.0M to do it. That's a hallmark of professional portfolio management on a name that's already delivered a life-changing gain: give up blue-sky upside you may not need, use the proceeds to buy real protection, and pocket the difference.
• ⏰ Timing tells the story: The put expires September 18 — 11 days before Micron's fiscal Q4 earnings on September 29. That means this hedge covers the pre-earnings drift and any pullback into the print, not the earnings reaction itself. The call, by contrast, runs a full year out to June 2027 — a true long-dated overwrite, not an earnings play.
• 🤔 Why hedge a winner like this? MU is up ≈200%+ YTD, but it's also ≈22% off its June 25 record high, sitting inside a memory-sector bear market, facing a high-profile short (Michael Burry disclosed shorting MU at $1,051.87), fresh DRAM antitrust litigation, a new direct competitor (SK Hynix) just listed on Nasdaq, and insider selling at its highest level since 2010. None of that contradicts the bullish HBM story — it's exactly the kind of noise that makes a disciplined holder lock in gains with a collar instead of riding it naked.

Unusual Score context: A combined ≈$35M in premium changing hands on the same underlying within 90 minutes, structured as an offsetting overwrite + hedge, is the kind of flow that shows up a handful of times a year on a single name — not an everyday occurrence, but not the "biggest trade ever seen" either. Read it as a real institution actively managing risk, not a lottery ticket.

---

📈 Technical Setup / Chart Check-Up

YTD Performance Chart

Micron's 2026 has been one of the great mega-cap runs of the cycle — up ≈200%+ YTD, powered by the HBM shortage turning into a multi-year, sold-out order book. But the chart's most important recent feature is the last three weeks: after peaking on June 25, MU has round-tripped roughly 22% lower as the whole memory complex (Micron, Samsung, SK Hynix) fell into its own bear market on valuation nerves and a South Korea capacity-build scare. That's the exact setup where a holder locks in gains with a collar rather than betting the pullback is over.

Key observations:

• 🚀 Historic re-rating: A ≈700% one-year run on record HBM4 demand and sold-out 2026 capacity
• 📉 Sharp pullback: ≈22% off the June 25 high, ≈7% off the ≈$998 print from just a few sessions ago
• 🎢 Elevated volatility: A stock that can move double-digit percentages on sector-wide sentiment alone, not just company news
• ⚠️ Wide analyst dispersion: Price targets now span from ≈$867 average pre-earnings to a post-earnings range of $1,500–$2,000 (TD Cowen, Cantor Fitzgerald) — a sign both of conviction and of how much optimism is already priced in

Gamma-Based Support & Resistance Analysis

Current Price: ≈$925.36

🔵 Support Levels (Put Gamma Below Price):

• $925 — Immediate support, Strong, essentially right at spot (0.04% away)
• $920 — Very Strong support — notice this is exactly where today's put buyer struck. Not a coincidence; they bought protection right at a real gamma floor.
• $900 — Very Strong support, ≈2.7% below spot — the next real line in the sand if $920 gives way
• $910 / $800 — secondary support walls further down, showing dealers have real put gamma stacked all the way to $800

🟠 Resistance Levels (Call Gamma Above Price):

• $930 — Immediate ceiling, Moderate strength, just 0.5% overhead
• $950 — Secondary resistance, Moderate, ≈2.7% above spot
• $1,000 — A meaningful Resistance Wall ≈8% above spot — the level dealers would defend hardest on any near-term squeeze attempt long before price gets anywhere near the sold $1,210 strike

What this means for traders: MU is pinned in a tight band right around $920–$930 — support directly below at $920/$925, resistance directly above at $930. The put buyer's $920 strike sits on top of the single strongest nearby gamma floor, which is a textbook place to buy insurance: if that level breaks, the drop can accelerate because dealer hedging flips from stabilizing to amplifying. The sold $1,210 call, by contrast, is so far above the current gamma structure (past even the $1,000 resistance wall) that it's really a "surrender everything above a near-double" trade, not a near-term ceiling call.

Implied Move Analysis

Options market pricing for upcoming expirations:

• 📅 Monthly OPEX (July 17 — 4 days): ±10.92% (±$101.24) → Range: $825.48 – $1,027.96
• 📅 Triple Witch (September 18 — THIS TRADE'S PUT EXPIRATION): Range roughly $679.71 – $1,173.73
• 📅 LEAP (June 17, 2027 — THIS TRADE'S CALL EXPIRATION): ±83.11% (±$770.17) → Range: $156.55 – $1,696.89

Translation for regular folks: Even over the next four days, the options market is pricing a ±11% swing for MU — that's how volatile this name still is post-earnings. Zoom out to the put's September expiration and the market is effectively pricing anything from ≈$680 to ≈$1,174 as plausible — which puts the $920 put strike comfortably inside the range where real money gets made if the pullback continues. Zoom out further to the call's June 2027 expiration, and the implied range widens to $156 – $1,697 — the $1,210 strike sits toward the upper-middle of that band, meaning the market itself thinks blue-sky upside past $1,210 is a real but far-from-guaranteed outcome. That's exactly the kind of asymmetry a disciplined holder sells into: give up a scenario the market prices as uncertain anyway, in exchange for guaranteed cash today.

---

🎪 Catalysts

✅ Recent (Last 3 Months)

Record Fiscal Q3 2026 Earnings — June 24, 2026 Revenue came in at ≈$41.46B (+346% YoY) versus ≈$35.84B consensus, with non-GAAP EPS of ≈$25.11 beating ≈$20.28 consensus by ≈24%. (TradingKey, CNBC) GAAP gross margin hit ≈84.6%, with quarterly-record operating cash flow of ≈$25.4B and adjusted free cash flow of ≈$18.3B. (Micron IR) HBM4 is now in high-volume production for the lead customer, with HBM4E in development for calendar-2027. (Micron FQ3 remarks) Management guided the September quarter to ≈$50B revenue, ≈86% gross margin, EPS ≈$31 ± $1. (TradingKey)

The Pullback — Memory Complex Falls Into a Bear Market Despite the blowout print, MU has retreated ≈22% from its June 25 record high; Micron, Samsung, SK Hynix and the memory ETF are all down 20%+ from recent highs, with semis losing ≈$1.5T in combined market value and MU alone shedding ≈$350B. (Yahoo Finance, CNBC) The trigger set: a weak Samsung Q2 profit guide, valuation nerves after a ≈700% one-year run, and fears of a South Korea capacity build. (Forbes)

2026 HBM4 Output Fully Sold Out Micron's entire 2026 HBM4 output is committed under long-term agreements, and NVIDIA has certified Micron (alongside Samsung and SK Hynix) for the Vera Rubin platform. (Sahm Capital, Simply Wall St)

DRAM/NAND Pricing Still Rising, But Decelerating Q3-2026 contract prices are still climbing but at a cooler pace than Q2's ≈60% jumps — estimates range from conservative ≈13–18% DRAM / ≈10–15% NAND, to aggressive Street calls near ≈40–50%. (TrendForce, Tom's Hardware) The deceleration itself is a hedging rationale — consumer OEMs are hitting an affordability ceiling even as hyperscalers lock up roughly half of production. (Tom's Hardware)

Analyst Targets Raised Hard — But With Extreme Dispersion Post-earnings, TD Cowen lifted its target from $660 to $1,500, and Cantor Fitzgerald went to $2,000 on June 29; the average target jumped from ≈$867 to ≈$1,458, with consensus Buy across ≈29 analysts. (MarketBeat, Public.com)

🔮 Upcoming (Next 6 Months)

Fiscal Q4 2026 Earnings — Tuesday, September 29, 2026 (after close) The single largest scheduled catalyst inside the hedge window, landing ≈11 days after the Sep-18 puts expire — meaning the puts cover the pre-earnings run-up/pullback, not the print itself. Management has already guided to ≈$50B revenue, ≈86% margin, ≈$31 EPS; watch for HBM4 ramp commentary and calendar-2027 HBM pricing. (Wall Street Horizon, TipRanks)

SK Hynix Nasdaq ADR Listed — July 10, 2026 A ≈$26.5B raise — the largest-ever U.S. listing by a foreign company — for the HBM market-share leader (≈56% of HBM). A newly listed, directly comparable pure-play can pull capital and re-rate the whole group in either direction. (CNBC, Yahoo Finance)

Q3 → Q4 DRAM/NAND Contract Resets (through H2-2026) The pace of price hikes is the key swing factor for the FQ4/FQ1 guide — direction is up, magnitude is the debate. (TechSpot)

HBM4E Development Milestones Toward calendar-2027 volume production and continued NVIDIA Vera Rubin qualification progress. (Micron FQ3 remarks)

Idaho Fab (ID1) First Wafer, Mid-Calendar-2027 Part of the ≈$250B U.S. build-out investors will track for execution and cost milestones (ID2 late-2028, New York longer-dated). (Futurum)

⚠️ Risk Catalysts — Why a Holder Would Hedge Here

• 🐻 Peak-cycle call: Bloomberg Intelligence flags the global memory shortage likely peaked in Q2-2026, easing into 2027 with possible oversupply by 2028 as Korea adds capacity. (AOL/247WallSt)
• 🐋 High-profile short: Michael Burry disclosed (July 2) shorting MU at $1,051.87, calling it a "destroyer of capital" in a "psychological bubble." (Benzinga)
• ⚖️ Litigation overhang: New antitrust/class-action suits allege Micron, Samsung and SK Hynix coordinated DRAM supply cuts during the AI boom. (FXLeaders)
• 🆚 New competitor float: The July 10 SK Hynix listing invites near-term capital rotation toward the HBM share leader. (Forbes)
• 👔 Insider selling at its highest level since 2010, including CEO Sanjay Mehrotra under a 10b5-1 plan. (Yahoo Finance)

---

🎲 Price Targets & Probabilities

Using gamma levels, implied move data, and the catalyst calendar, here are the scenarios through the put's September 18 expiration:

📈 Bull Case (30% probability)

Target: $970 – $1,030

• 🚀 DRAM/NAND pricing resets come in toward the aggressive end (≈40–50%) as hyperscalers keep locking up supply
• 💪 No incremental negative litigation/short headlines; the Burry short and antitrust suits fade as non-events
• 📊 SK Hynix's ADR debut proves additive (rising-tide re-rating for the whole HBM group) rather than a rotation drain
• 📈 Break back above the $930 gamma resistance and the $1,000 wall reopens the path toward the June $998 recent high

This is where the sold $1,210 call is designed to be irrelevant — even a strong bull case here stays well below the strike, so the overwrite costs the seller nothing in this scenario while they've already banked $24.0M.

🎯 Base Case (45% probability)

Target: $900 – $950 (CHOPPY CONSOLIDATION)

• ⚖️ Memory-sector bear market continues to digest the June rally without a fresh catalyst until earnings
• 📊 Price hikes continue at a moderate, decelerating pace — enough to support the story, not enough to reignite momentum
• 🔄 Price oscillates between the $920/$925 gamma support zone and $930/$950 resistance for weeks
• 💤 This is the collar's "ideal" outcome: puts likely expire worthless (insurance well spent, not needed), calls stay miles out of the money, and the $13.0M net credit is pure found money

📉 Bear Case (25% probability)

Target: $780 – $850 (TESTS THE PUT STRIKE AND BEYOND)

• 😰 A negative litigation development or a credible follow-through on the Burry short thesis triggers renewed selling
• 🚨 South Korea capacity fears intensify, or a weak Samsung/SK Hynix print reignites "peak cycle" narrative
• 🔨 Break below the $920 Very Strong support (where the put is struck) opens a fast move toward $900, then the next real floor
• 💸 The $920 puts pay off meaningfully in this scenario — exactly the outcome they were bought to cover

Put P&L illustration (September 18 expiration, 861 contracts):

• MU at $850: puts worth ≈$70, gain ≈($70 − $132) is still a loss per-contract at these levels — the put needs a genuinely sharp move to profit outright, which is the point: it's insurance, not a directional bet
• MU at $780: puts worth ≈$140, small profit versus the $132 paid — breakeven is roughly $788 on the put leg alone
• MU flat or higher at $920+: puts expire worthless, ≈$11.0M "insurance premium" spent — offset by the $24.0M already collected on the call side

---

💡 Four Ways Readers Might Play This

🎲 YOLO Trader

Chasing this exact structure isn't really a YOLO setup — it's boring, credit-collecting risk management. If you want the lottery-ticket version of the bearish-lean read, a short-dated, small-size $900 or $890 put into the September window offers leveraged downside exposure without tying up $132/contract like the institutional print did. Just know: implied move data shows MU can swing ±11% in a single week, so a short-dated put can also get run over fast if the bounce comes first. Risk only what you can lose completely.

📈 Swing Trader

The gamma map is doing the talking: $920–$925 is the line to watch. A swing long works on a bounce off that zone with a stop below $900 (the next Very Strong support), targeting a retest of $950–$1,000. A swing short works on a confirmed break below $920 with a target near $850–$880, using the actual put strike from today's trade as your directional confirmation level — institutions already picked $920 as the line that matters.

💵 Premium Collector

This is your trade's whole spirit, just executed at retail scale. Selling far-OTM calls against existing MU shares (structured similarly to the $1,210 LEAP overwrite, just nearer-dated and closer to the money for more premium) collects income while you wait out the memory-sector chop. Pair it with a modest OTM put purchase — even a $850 or $870 put — funded partly by the call premium, and you've built your own mini-collar. Just size it to real share ownership; naked short calls carry undefined risk and margin requirements retail accounts often can't support.

🌱 Beginner

The core lesson here is simple and worth remembering: big option trades aren't always bets — sometimes they're insurance. This holder didn't dump MU or bet against it; they locked in upside they were happy to give away and used the proceeds to buy protection on a stock that's already made them a fortune. If you own MU and it's grown into an outsized position, the honest beginner move isn't fancy options — it's simply trimming some shares to a size you're comfortable holding through a ≈22% swing like the one MU just had. Options collars are a great next step to learn once you're comfortable with single-leg calls and puts first.

---

⚠️ Risk Factors & Honest Limits — What The Tape Cannot Prove

• 🤝 The call side is a cross — we can't see true conviction. A negotiated block means a known counterparty took the other side; OPRA doesn't tell us broker identity, customer identity, or whether the counterparty is a market maker facilitating a client vs. a genuine opposite-direction trader. We're calling this "bearish-to-neutral lean," not proven bearish intent.
• ⚡ The put's 52%-across mid-fill weakens the aggressor read. Ordinarily a lit buy that lifts the offer (high %-across) is a strong "someone wants this now" signal. At 52% — essentially the midpoint — we cannot confidently say this was urgent buying versus a patiently-worked fill; the nearby multi-leg prints suggest it may be one leg of a structure we can't fully reconstruct.
• 👻 No visibility into the underlying position being hedged. We're inferring a large existing long (stock and/or calls) from the shape of this trade, but OPRA cannot show us the equity or LEAP-call position that makes this collar make sense. It's possible this is a smaller position than the premium suggests, or a purely speculative structure with no underlying hedge at all.
• 📊 Size mismatch on the call leg. The screenshot shows 1,000 contracts / $24.0M; the raw tape shows ≈1,260 contracts traded in the same cross window. We used the reconciled $24.0M print as primary — if the full 1,260 turns out to be one economic block, the true credit collected could be modestly higher.
• ✅ Open vs. close is now PROVEN (July 14 OI print). Both legs opened: the $1,210 call went 184 → 1,346 (+1,162 vs. a 1,000-lot trade) and the $920 put went 449 → 1,354 (+905 vs. an 861-lot trade). No transfer drag, no unwind. The collar is a real, live position. What OI still cannot prove is the counterparty's conviction on the crossed call leg, or the size of the MU stock position we infer sits behind the overwrite.

---

🎯 The Bottom Line

Real talk: Someone with real skin in Micron just did the responsible thing after an incredible run — they sold far-out-of-the-money upside they may never need and used the money to buy real downside protection, and they got paid $13.0M net to do it. This isn't a signal to panic-sell MU. It's a signal that even the people most bullish on the HBM story are managing risk into a genuinely uncertain few months: a memory-sector bear market, a high-profile short, fresh litigation, a new listed competitor, and record insider selling — all while the fundamental HBM story stays fully intact with 2026 sold out and a ≈$50B September guide already on the books.

If you own MU:

• ✅ Consider whether your position size still matches your risk tolerance after a ≈200%+ YTD gain — trimming into strength is never a mistake
• 🛡️ A collar (sell a far-OTM call, buy a near-money put) is a legitimate way to lock in gains without fully exiting — this is literally what today's trade shows
• 📊 Watch $920 closely — it's both the strongest nearby gamma floor and exactly where this institutional put is struck

If you're watching from the sidelines:

• ⏰ Don't chase strength above $950 without a plan — the gamma map shows real resistance right there
• 🎯 A pullback toward $900–$920 (the Very Strong support zone) would be a much more favorable entry than chasing here
• 📅 September 29 earnings is the next confirmed catalyst — the Sep-18 put expiration deliberately sits just before it

If you're bearish:

• 📉 $920 is your confirmation level — a clean break below opens the door toward $900, then the wider air pocket beyond
• ⚠️ Remember the bull case is real too: sold-out HBM4, record margins, and a guided $50B quarter aren't going away because the stock corrected

Mark your calendar — Key dates:

• 📅 July 17 — Monthly OPEX (±10.92% implied move window closes)
• 📅 September 18, 2026 — Triple witch, this trade's put expiration
• 📅 September 29, 2026 (after close) — Fiscal Q4 earnings, the next confirmed catalyst
• 📅 June 17, 2027 — This trade's call expiration (LEAP)

Come back ≈06:30 ET tomorrow for the OPRA open-interest update that confirms whether both legs opened as read here — we'll update this article the moment that data lands.

Disclaimer: Options trading involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. This analysis is for educational purposes only and not financial advice. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results. The mechanism reads here (cross vs. lit, %-across NBBO) are tape facts; the intent behind them (why this specific holder traded) is inferred, not proven. Always do your own research and consider consulting a licensed financial advisor before trading. This flow may reflect complex portfolio hedging needs specific to a large institutional holder that don't translate directly to retail position sizing.

---

Last updated: July 14, 2026 — the next-day OPRA open-interest snapshot resolved both open/close flags. The Jun-2027 $1,210 call rose 184 → 1,346 (+1,162 vs. a 1,000-lot trade, STO) and the Sep-2026 $920 put rose 449 → 1,354 (+905 vs. an 861-lot trade, BTO). Both legs are confirmed fresh opens with no transfer drag — the "opening collar" read HELD in full. No change to thesis, tone, or title. The provisional ⏳ callout published on July 13 has been replaced with the ✅ RESOLVED box above.

---

About Micron Technology: Micron Technology designs and manufactures DRAM and NAND flash memory and storage solutions, including a fast-growing high-bandwidth memory (HBM) franchise central to the AI data-center buildout, with a market cap of ≈$1.1 trillion in the Semiconductors & Related Devices industry.