🤝 WULF $2.6M Bullish Block Cross — A Desk Bets on TeraWulf's AI/HPC Pivot Reaching $35
Last updated: 2026-06-04
✅ RESOLVED — Next-Day OI Update (2026-06-04): The $35 call OI rose 372 → 10,629 (+10,257) — the long-call BTO opened as predicted. Read confirmed.
📅 June 3, 2026 | 🔥 Unusual Activity Detected
🎯 The Quick Take
Someone just dropped ≈$2.6 MILLION on WULF call options — a negotiated block cross betting that TeraWulf's AI/HPC transformation keeps driving the stock toward $35 by September. The buyer is paying for a thesis that has already moved the stock from $3.40 to nearly $27 in 12 months: HPC hosting revenue has officially overtaken bitcoin mining, and Oppenheimer already has a $35 price target — exactly the strike that was just purchased. This is a high-conviction, high-risk bet on a volatile ≈4.3-beta small-cap. Buckle up — this one moves fast in both directions.
📊 Company Overview
TeraWulf (NASDAQ: WULF) is a Easton, MD-based digital infrastructure company that began life as a zero-carbon bitcoin miner and has pivoted dramatically into AI and HPC data-center colocation hosting — making it one of the most compelling "power-as-moat" stories in the AI infrastructure buildout.
- Market Cap: ≈$13.2 billion on ≈495.5 million shares outstanding (stockanalysis.com)
- Industry: Digital Infrastructure / Data Center Hosting (formerly Bitcoin Mining / Electronic Computers)
- 52-Week Range: $3.40 – $27.47 — trading near a multi-year high
- Beta: ≈4.30 — this stock moves violently; position-size accordingly
- The Pivot: Q1 2026 was the historic inflection point — HPC lease revenue hit $21.0M (+117% from Q4 2025), officially exceeding bitcoin mining revenue for the first time
- The Backlog: 522 contracted critical-IT MW and over $12.8 billion of contracted revenue, anchored by Google-backstopped Fluidstack leases and the newly announced 1+ GW Muskie Kentucky campus
Real talk: this is no longer just a bitcoin miner. The market is pricing TeraWulf as a power-infrastructure play for the AI buildout — with actual hyperscaler leases, investment-grade credit support from Google, and ≈$12.8B of contracted future revenue. The bull case is real. So are the risks.
💰 The Option Flow Breakdown
📊 The Tape (June 3, 2026 @ 12:58:59 ET)
| Time | Buy/Sell | Call/Put | Expiration | Premium | Strike | Volume | OI | Size | Spot | Option Price | Option Symbol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12:58:59 | BUY | CALL | 2026-09-18 | ≈$2.6M | $35 | 10,000 | 372 | 10,000 | $26.08 | $2.61 | WULF20260918C35 |
Flow-type: 🤝 BLOCK CROSS — This is a single-leg negotiated cross, NOT an aggressive electronic sweep. A broker matched a buyer and seller off the open book. There is a known counterparty on the other side. Weigh the open/close read and strike geometry over the raw premium headline. A $2.6M cross means $2.6M changed hands between two parties who already agreed on price — it signals conviction, not panic-buying urgency.
⏳ Come back tomorrow for the OI double-check (≈06:30 ET pre-market)
Today's volume is 10,000 contracts against a prior open interest of only 372 contracts — a Vol/OI ratio of ≈26.9. Because volume is nearly 27× prior OI, the vast majority of this activity MUST be new opens: mathematically, at least ≈9,628 contracts are fresh opens (the portion volume exceeds prior OI). This is about as strong an open-direction signal as you can get from intraday data alone.
Prediction: Check the OPRA OI snapshot tomorrow pre-market. The Sep-18-2026 $35 call OI should rise from 372 toward ≈10,000–10,500. If OI rises ≈+10,000, the BTO Long Call open is confirmed with HIGH confidence. If OI is flat or falls, that would be a major surprise inconsistent with the tape — and a signal to reassess.
🤓 What This Actually Means — Plain English
Let me decode this step by step.
What did they buy?
A call option is the right to buy 100 shares of WULF at the strike price ($35) any time before expiration (September 18, 2026). They bought 10,000 contracts, which controls 1,000,000 shares of WULF.
At $2.61 per contract (the option premium), 10,000 contracts × 100 shares × $2.61 = ≈$2.61 million paid upfront — the maximum loss on this position.
The numbers that matter:
- $35 strike vs. $26.08 spot = ≈34% out of the money — WULF needs to rally ≈34% from here just to reach the strike price
- Breakeven at expiration: $35 + $2.61 = $37.61 — WULF needs to trade ≈44% above today's spot for this option to be profitable at expiry
- Time to expiry: 107 days (3.5 months) — not a lot of runway for a 34% move
- Vol/OI ratio: ≈26.9 — for every 1 contract of prior open interest, ≈27 new contracts were printed today. This is a fresh, large new open.
- Option symbol: WULF20260918C35
Why is this a BTO Long Call?
A BTO (Buy-to-Open) Long Call is when someone pays cash to open a new long options position. They paid $2.61 per contract — this is money out of their pocket, not a credit. They are the buyer: if WULF goes up dramatically, they profit; if it doesn't reach $35, they lose the $2.61 they paid. This is the most straightforward bullish options structure — pay a defined premium, hope the stock rips.
Is $35 reachable in 107 days?
This is the key question. The options market itself is pricing in a ≈50% implied move by September 18, 2026 — giving an upper range of ≈$39.97 and a lower range of ≈$13.19 (per the implied move model). So yes, $35 is within the implied probability cone. It's not a "will never happen" strike — Oppenheimer already has a $35 price target and Morgan Stanley sits at $42. But getting there in 3.5 months requires things to go well — a Q2 beat, new hyperscaler contracts, and a cooperative risk tape.
The high-beta caveat:
WULF has a beta of ≈4.3. That means when the broader market moves 1%, WULF tends to move ≈4.3%. This cuts both ways. On good days it can rip 10-15% in a session (it was up ≈12% on May 26 after the Muskie Kentucky announcement). On bad days, it can give all of that back and more. Buying a 34%-OTM call on a 4.3-beta name is a high-risk, high-reward trade — not a defensive position.
What the tape cannot prove:
We do not know the buyer's identity, broker, or whether this is part of a larger portfolio hedge (e.g., short stock + long calls). We also cannot rule out a position predating our 180-day archive lookback. The cross structure means a known counterparty SOLD these calls — they may be a market maker delta-hedging (neutral) or a seller with a different view. The tape only tells us someone paid $2.61 to own the $35 strike. It does not prove insider information or guaranteed success.
📈 Technical Setup / Chart Check-Up
YTD Performance

WULF has been one of the most explosive small-cap AI-infrastructure names of the past 12 months — running from a 52-week low of $3.40 to a high of $27.47, a move of ≈8x. That said, YTD 2026 performance is roughly flat (≈+0.5%) as the stock had already front-run the AI/HPC pivot story in late 2025. The run to 12-month highs came in a burst — up ≈12% on May 26 after the Muskie Kentucky data-center acquisition — and the stock has been consolidating around $26 since. Today's intraday range was ≈$25.97–$27.73, and the call block traded at a spot of $26.08, essentially mid-range on the day.
The base-case setup: price is caught between the two nearest gamma walls ($25 and $27) and needs a fresh catalyst to break out of that range.
Gamma-Based Support & Resistance

Current Price: ≈$26.54 (per GEX snapshot)
The gamma map for WULF is relatively sparse in absolute dollar terms — this is a small-cap, not AMD — but the structure is clear and meaningful:
🟠 Call Gamma Resistance (Overhead Sellers):
- $27 — Very Strong resistance (24.0B total GEX, net GEX +18.9B call-dominant). This is the immediate ceiling. Market makers will be selling into any rally toward $27, creating near-term friction. Price has been unable to clear and hold $27 for several sessions.
- $27.50 — Moderate resistance (7.1B total GEX, net +5.3B). A secondary cap between $27 and $28.
- $28 — Moderate resistance (10.3B total GEX, net +9.9B). Stack of three call-gamma walls at $27, $27.50, $28 creates a meaningful overhead gauntlet to clear.
- $29 — Moderate (9.3B total GEX). Further out but still a cap before $30.
- $30 — Strong resistance (16.7B total GEX, net +16.5B). The next major wall above $29 — clearing $30 would be a significant technical event.
- $32 — Moderate (8.0B total GEX). One more layer before analysts' buy-zone.
- $35 — Call gamma wall present at 7.2B total GEX. This is precisely where today's block cross strike landed — the $35 strike already carries measurable open interest from prior sessions, and the gamma map confirms it as a recognized overhead level. Breaking above $35 removes a meaningful gamma headwind and could see an acceleration.
🔵 Put Gamma Support (Downside Floors):
- $26 — Moderate support (18.0B total GEX, net GEX +9.4B call-dominant). The current price level is essentially sitting ON this support, giving near-term pin dynamics — market makers defend $26 on the way down.
- $25 — Very Strong support (24.6B total GEX, net +17.7B). This is the primary gamma floor. A drop toward $25 should find aggressive buying from market makers managing gamma exposure. This is the line in the sand: hold $25, bullish structure intact.
- $24 — Moderate support (5.7B total GEX).
- $23 — Moderate support (9.7B total GEX). Below $25, the next real cushion.
What this means for the $35 calls:
The buyer is betting that the ≈8 call-gamma walls between $26.54 and $35 ($27, $27.50, $28, $29, $30, $31, $32, $35) all give way over the next 107 days. Each wall creates near-term selling pressure from market makers. To clear all of them requires a sustained series of catalysts — not just one good news print. That said, on a name with ≈4.3 beta and ≈22% short interest, a strong catalyst can compress weeks of gamma-wall resistance into days.
Implied Move Analysis

The options market is pricing in extreme volatility for WULF — consistent with its speculative status as a high-beta AI/crypto infrastructure name. Here's what the implied-move model says across timeframes:
| Timeframe | Expiry | DTE | Implied Move | Upper Range | Lower Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weekly | 2026-06-05 | 2 | ±8.1% | $28.71 | $24.43 |
| Monthly OPEX | 2026-07-17 | 44 | ±31.2% | $34.87 | $18.27 |
| Quarterly (our trade) | 2026-09-18 | 107 | ±50.2% | $39.93 | $13.23 |
| LEAP | 2027-06-17 | 379 | ±96.1% | $52.13 | $1.03 |
The quarterly implied move (the window that matters for this trade) is ±50.2% — meaning the market is pricing a range of roughly $13.23 to $39.93 by September 18, 2026. The $35 strike sits inside that upper boundary.
This is key context: the options market already "believes" $35 by September is plausible — the $35 strike is within the 1-standard-deviation implied move cone. But $35 is toward the upper end of that range, not the midpoint. The buyer needs above-average execution of the WULF thesis to land in the money, not just average.
Also note: $37.61 breakeven is above the upper OPEX label of $39.93 for September 18 in the model — the buyer needs a near-best-case outcome for positive P&L at expiry, not just reaching the strike.
🎪 Catalysts
✅ Already Happened — In the Books
- Q1 2026 Earnings (May 8, 2026): HPC lease revenue hit $21.0M (+117% QoQ), officially exceeding bitcoin mining for the first time. 60 MW energized at Lake Mariner. Adj. EBITDA improved sharply to −$4.1M from −$50.9M in Q4 2025. Total contracted backlog: 522 MW / $12.8B+.
- Muskie Kentucky Acquisition (May 26, 2026): ≈1 GW eastern Kentucky campus on 285 acres, with 500 MW targeting 2H 2028 and another 500 MW by 2H 2030. Stock jumped ≈12% intraday to fresh 12-month highs — the catalyst that put the $35 calls on radar.
- Fluidstack/Google Anchor Deal + CB-5 Expansion: 200+ MW at Lake Mariner for 10 years, $3.7B–$8.7B contracted revenue, Google backstops $1.8B. Then CB-5 added 160 MW more, lifting Google's backstop to ≈$3.2B total and its equity stake to ≈14%.
- Cayuga Site (Lansing, NY): 80-year ground lease, up to 400 MW targeted, 138 MW ready-for-service in 2026.
- April 2026 $900M+ Equity Raise: gross proceeds earmarked for the Hawesville, KY data-center campus (MarketBeat). Dilutive but confirms the capital pipeline for buildout.
- Morgan Stanley PT to $42 (May 19, 2026): Overweight, the Street high. Followed by Oppenheimer to $35, KBW to $33, B. Riley to $32, Clear Street to $32 — a cluster of post-Muskie target hikes.
🚀 Upcoming — Inside the Sep-18-2026 Expiration Window
- MW Energization Ramp (ongoing, 2026): This is the single most important catalyst for the $35 calls. Each tranche of MW powered on at Lake Mariner converts contracted backlog into recognized HPC lease revenue. CB-5 (160 MW) and the full Fluidstack 200+ MW deployment are both targeted by year-end 2026. Cayuga's 138 MW ready-for-service in 2026 adds another tranche. Each milestone is a potential "beat-and-raise" trigger.
- Q2 2026 Earnings (late July / early August 2026): Based on Q1 cadence, expect the print around late July–early August. Watch HPC lease revenue progress from $21.0M — the bull case needs it stepping up substantially as new MW come online. Any commentary on the CB-5 and Cayuga timelines will be closely watched.
- New Hyperscale Contract Wins: With 522 MW contracted and a 250–500 MW/year delivery target, any incremental named hyperscaler beyond Fluidstack/Core42, or a Core42 expansion-option exercise (+108 MW critical IT), would be a sharp upside catalyst — these announcements have historically moved the stock double-digits intraday.
- Bitcoin Price Dynamics: BTC was ≈$66,965 on June 3, 2026, off its highs on ≈$2.97B of ETF outflows. Bitcoin is now a secondary driver (HPC is the primary story), but BTC sentiment still swings the stock on a day-to-day basis. A renewed BTC rally would add a tailwind; further BTC weakness is a drag on legacy mining economics and overall risk sentiment for the name.
- Muskie Development Progress: First MW from the Kentucky campus isn't until 2H 2028, so this is a long-dated story driver rather than a near-term revenue event. But any engineering/permitting milestones or named anchor tenant for Muskie would be a fresh bullish catalyst in the window.
💡 Trading Ideas
🛡️ Conservative — "Confirm, Then Participate"
For entry-level options traders or stock-only investors, $2K-$10K portfolio allocation
Before doing anything: wait for tomorrow's OI snapshot (≈06:30 ET). If WULF20260918C35 OI rises from 372 toward ≈10,000+, the BTO open is confirmed and the bullish structure is on solid ground. Don't act on a cross until OI confirms direction.
Cautious path (post-confirmation):
- 📈 Consider a small WULF stock position on a pullback toward $25 (Very Strong gamma support, 24.6B total GEX)
- 🎯 The $25 level is defended by the biggest gamma floor on the board — market makers buy here aggressively
- 🛡️ Risk: a close below $23 (next meaningful support) invalidates the near-term structure
- 📅 Set an alert for Q2 earnings (late July / early August) — that's the first major catalyst that could justify adding exposure
Why this works: You get exposure to the AI/HPC pivot story without paying high options premiums. If the MW ramp hits targets and Q2 beats, WULF can make a large move. Stock doesn't have the theta-decay clock working against you.
⚖️ Balanced — "Lower-Strike Call Spread for the Breakout"
For swing traders, $5K-$20K, 2–3 month horizon
Rather than buying a 34%-OTM call like the whale did, target the more near-term breakout above the $27–$30 gamma wall cluster. A bull call spread lets you define risk while participating in a meaningful move.
Illustrative structure (verify live prices before executing):
- 📈 Buy WULF $28 Call, Sep-18-2026 expiration
- 📉 Sell WULF $32 Call, Sep-18-2026 expiration (reduces cost, defines max profit)
- 💰 Net debit: estimate ≈$0.80–$1.20 per spread (verify live)
- 🎯 Max profit: ≈$2.80–$3.20 if WULF is above $32 at September expiry
- ⚠️ Max loss: the net debit paid (roughly $80–$120 per spread, 100x multiplier)
Why this works: The $27–$30 gamma walls are the near-term battle lines. A Q2 beat showing material HPC revenue growth + any new hyperscaler announcement could punch through these walls. The defined-risk spread limits damage if WULF stays pinned below $27 resistance.
Key dates: Q2 earnings (late July / early August) and ongoing MW energization cadence are the triggers inside the September window.
🚀 Aggressive — "The Whale's Strike, Scaled Down"
For experienced options traders, high-risk appetite, $1K-$5K max allocation
The whale bought the Sep-18-2026 $35 Call at $2.61. If you have conviction in the same thesis — accelerating MW ramp, Q2 beat, new hyperscaler wins, bitcoin tailwind — you can buy a smaller lot at the same strike.
The math, scaled down:
- 💸 1 contract × $2.61 × 100 = $261 out-of-pocket
- 🎯 Breakeven at expiration: $37.61 (≈44% above $26.08 spot)
- 📈 At $35 (at-the-money at expiry), the option has $0 intrinsic value — but time value approaching expiry may give some recovery. Real profits start above $37.61.
- 🚀 If WULF hits $40 by September: intrinsic value $5.00/contract. Net gain = $5.00 − $2.61 = $2.39 per contract or ≈91.6% return on premium
- 💀 Max loss: $261 per contract if WULF is below $35 on September 18, 2026
YOLO version: 5 contracts = $1,305. You're aligned with the whale directionally, controlling 500 shares of WULF.
Critical warning: This is a 34%-OTM call with 107 days to expiry on a name with ≈22% short interest and ≈4.3 beta. That combination is explosive in both directions. A failed MW ramp timeline, a weak Q2 print, or a broad market risk-off event can vaporize this option's value quickly. Only allocate money you are completely comfortable losing in full. This is not a "safe" options play — it's a directional speculation on a high-velocity small-cap.
🎲 Price Targets & Scenarios Through September 18, 2026
Using gamma levels, the implied-move model (±50.2% cone = $13.23 to $39.93), catalyst calendar, and the analyst target range ($32–$42):
📈 Bull Case (20% probability by September 18)
Target: $35–$40+
How WULF gets there: Q2 earnings print in late July shows HPC lease revenue ≈$30M+ (versus $21M in Q1) as CB-5 and Cayuga MW come online. A new named hyperscaler contract (not yet public) gets announced. Bitcoin stabilizes or recovers above $70K, lifting crypto-adjacent sentiment. The $35 gamma wall (7.2B total GEX) gets cleared, triggering short covering on ≈22% short float and a squeeze toward $40. Morgan Stanley's $42 target gets validated.
$35 Call P&L in bull case:
- WULF at $35: intrinsic $0, but remaining time value — may trade at $2–3. Roughly breakeven.
- WULF at $40: intrinsic $5.00. Net gain ≈$2.39/contract (≈92% return on premium).
- WULF at $45: intrinsic $10.00. Net gain ≈$7.39/contract (≈283% return on premium).
🎯 Base Case (40% probability)
Target: $27–$33 range
WULF delivers steady MW energization through Q3, Q2 shows HPC revenue growing sequentially but not explosively, no new major hyperscaler named. Stock grinds up from $26 toward the $27–$30 gamma wall cluster, clearing some resistance but not all. BTC stays rangebound ≈$65–72K. Analysts trim near-term targets but maintain mid-$30s as 12-month objectives.
$35 Call P&L in base case:
- WULF at $30 by September 18: option expires worthless. Full $2.61 loss per contract.
- This is the gut-punch scenario — WULF goes up ≈15% and the call still expires worthless because the 34%-OTM strike was never reached.
📉 Bear Case (40% probability)
Target: below $25 — potential total loss
MW energization slips due to UPS install delays, substation commissioning issues, or contractor capacity constraints. Q2 earnings shows minimal sequential HPC revenue improvement. Bitcoin drops below $60K, hammering mining segment and risk sentiment. Dilution from the April $900M equity raise weighs on share price. The ≈22% short interest is a two-sided weapon — on the way down, shorts pile in and amplify the move.
$35 Call P&L in bear case:
- WULF at $22–$24: option expires worthless → 100% loss of $2.61/contract, or the full $2.61M premium for the whale.
⚠️ Risks & Honest Limits
Key risks the tape and analysis CANNOT eliminate:
- Execution risk on MW ramp: the entire valuation story requires on-time delivery of CB-5, Cayuga, and the broader Fluidstack schedule through 2026. UPS installs, substation timelines, and commissioning are the real operational risk — any slip in this chain delays revenue recognition.
- Debt load ($5.8B total): $5.8 billion in total debt ($2.5B convertibles at TeraWulf entity, $3.2B senior secured at WULF Compute LLC, $100M bridge loans) is substantial for a ≈$13B market cap with still-negative EBITDA. Refinancing risk in a higher-rate environment is real.
- Heavy dilution: share count rose ≈13% year-over-year; the April 2026 $900M equity offering added more shares. Each new raise dilutes existing holders and creates post-announcement selling pressure.
- Net losses: Q1 2026 net loss of ≈$427.6 million, driven by warrant revaluation, stock-based compensation, and impairment. Adj. EBITDA is still −$4.1M. The company is not yet self-funding its buildout from operations.
- Customer concentration: the contracted backlog leans heavily on Fluidstack (Google-backstopped). If that relationship changed — or if Google's warrant exercise creates overhang — the thesis narrows materially.
- Bitcoin price: BTC sub-$67K with ETF outflows continues to weigh on mining-segment sentiment, even though HPC is now the primary driver. A BTC crash to $50K would hit WULF hard regardless of HPC progress.
- ≈22% short interest: high short float means any squeeze can be violent and fast — but it also means the stock is heavily contested. Short sellers have a real fundamental thesis (debt, dilution, losses). Don't assume short covering always wins.
- 4.3 beta — this is a violent stock: A 10% drawdown in the Nasdaq can translate to a ≈43% drawdown in WULF in a risk-off tape. If you're long this name through options, you are also implicitly long the AI/crypto risk sentiment regime. Macro deterioration is your most dangerous adversary.
- 34% OTM + 44% breakeven in 107 days: the market needs to deliver a near-best-case scenario for this trade to be in the money at expiration. The base case is a losing trade.
What the tape CANNOT prove:
- The identity of the buyer or their broader portfolio context (could be a delta hedge against a short stock position — which would make it not directionally bullish at all)
- Whether the known counterparty (the seller in this cross) is a hedging market maker (neutral) or a fundamentally bearish seller
- Whether additional legs of a structure were executed in another asset class or OTC
🎯 The Bottom Line
Here's the deal: A desk just crossed 10,000 contracts of the Sep-18-2026 $35 calls for ≈$2.6M. With Vol/OI at ≈27x, this is overwhelmingly a fresh BTO Long Call open — a direct bullish bet that TeraWulf's AI/HPC transformation drives the stock ≈34% higher by mid-September.
What this trade is telling us:
- 🐋 A buyer (and a counterparty willing to sell at $2.61) has a view on WULF reaching $35 within 107 days — which aligns exactly with Oppenheimer's $35 price target
- 🎯 The $35 strike sits inside the ±50.2% implied-move cone for September 18 — it's a probabilistically feasible (not certain) destination
- 💰 $2.6M in premium at risk — the buyer's maximum loss is the entire premium; the breakeven requires WULF to trade at $37.61 or above
If you're bullish on the WULF AI/HPC story:
- ✅ Wait for OI confirmation tomorrow pre-market (≈06:30 ET) before acting
- 🎯 The $25 gamma floor (Very Strong, 24.6B GEX) is the key support level — hold $25, and the structure remains constructive
- 📅 Q2 earnings (late July / early August) and ongoing MW energization are the near-term catalysts to watch
If you're watching from the sidelines:
- 📅 Tomorrow, June 4, 2026 pre-market — check WULF20260918C35 OI; BTO confirmed if OI rises toward ≈10,000
- 📅 Late July / Early August 2026 — Q2 earnings print; the HPC lease revenue number is the metric to watch
- 📅 Throughout Q3 2026 — CB-5 (160 MW) and Fluidstack full 200+ MW deployment; each energization announcement is a potential catalyst
- 📅 September 18, 2026 — option expiration
The honest verdict: This is a high-conviction directional bet by someone who believes the MW ramp, Q2 beat, and potential new hyperscaler wins can overcome 8 layers of call-gamma resistance and a 34%-OTM strike in 107 days. It is not a low-risk trade. The 4.3 beta and ≈22% short interest mean the stock can move enormously in a single session — but also means it can give it all back just as fast. If you follow this trade, size it as speculation money — capital you can afford to lose in full — not as a core portfolio position.
Mark your calendar for June 4 pre-market OI confirmation.
Disclaimer: Options trading involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. The $35 calls analyzed here can expire entirely worthless — the full $2.61 per contract premium is at risk if WULF trades below $35 on September 18, 2026. The order-type classification (BTO Long Call) is HIGH confidence based on Vol/OI ≈26.9x but is subject to the June 4 OPRA OI snapshot for final confirmation. The flow type is a BLOCK CROSS (negotiated, known counterparty) — not an aggressive electronic sweep. This analysis is for educational and informational purposes only and is not financial advice. TeraWulf is a high-beta (≈4.3), speculative small-cap carrying $5.8B in debt and still-negative EBITDA — it is NOT suitable as a core portfolio holding and options on this name carry amplified risk. Always do your own research, understand your full risk before trading options, and consult a licensed financial advisor. Past unusual options activity does not guarantee profitable trading outcomes.
Last updated: 2026-06-03
About TeraWulf (WULF): TeraWulf Inc. is a digital-infrastructure company pivoting from zero-carbon bitcoin mining to AI and HPC data-center colocation hosting. Headquartered in Easton, MD. Market cap ≈$13.2B. 522 contracted critical-IT MW / $12.8B+ contracted revenue. Google-backstopped Fluidstack leases (360+ MW). Muskie (KY) 1+ GW campus (first MW 2H 2028). Q1 2026 HPC lease revenue ($21.0M) officially overtook mining for the first time. Sector: Digital Infrastructure / Data Center Hosting.